
This is actually from a week or so ago-- fake healthy food and homemade cookies (the lemon crinkles). I thought about it last night because I made non-healthy Betty Crocker chocolate chip cookies. The idea was for B. to bring them to his father, but he forgot, so now we have a whole plate of them in house.
Speaking of comfort food, I finally saw
Serenity last night. B. is not a Whedon fan, so I took advantage of his absence to see it.
I was expecting to love it, but was disappointed. Whedon works much better on the small screen than he does on the large, I think.
First of all, the character arc of Mal struck me as hackneyed. It's like someone told Whedon: "No, no, it's film. You *need* restorative three act structure." The idea was that he had to surrender his cynicism and rediscover the roots that made him fight against the alliance in the first place. One of the nicest thing about his character on the series was precisely his mixture of cynicism and idealism. He was a beautiful example of an idealist forced by life and circumstances into being a cynic. It felt like it dumbed down the complexity of the show to hang the story around his Need To Believe Again and accept River into his family.
Secondly, some of the actors just plain old didn't translate well to the big screen. Morena Baccarin is a case in point. She was moving to look at on the small screen, but felt wrong in the large. Now, I'll admit that may because she didn't seem to have much of a part in
Serenity. I have no idea what she was supposed to be doing in the film, besides humanizing Mal. It would have been better to either leave Inara out or to include her from the beginning. And was it me, or were they purposely dumbing down what she does for a living? Is that a mass appeal thing?
Thirdly, I just recoiled from the whole Deep Dark Sekret thing. I won't spoil and indicate what it is, but it seems to me that River was secret enough by herself without the whole Miranda thing. Restorative three-act structure rearing its ugly head again, I guess. The alliance is more interesting as a villain when it is more complex. They make this huge point that the villain in this piece is so dangerous because he is an intelligent believer. But his belief hangs on being ignorant. It would have been much more interesting if he had been an educated believer who was the darker side of Mal-- believing that he is forced by circumstances to do what is wrong in favor of what is right. It was the quality of his own actions that should have made him doubt, not finding out the Gweat Sekwet.
Finally, it just wasn't a film. It was a long television show. There was nothing particularly interesting about the lighting or the cinematography or even the sound that gave me the feeling that Whedon knows what to do with the big screen. The special effects were kind of irritating, actually. I'm very curious to see what he's going to do with
Wonder Woman.
Anyhow, I think that I'm going to hope that someone gives Whedon another television show. No shame in working to your strength, true?