(Yes, my first Sunday Salon post in several months. I am distractable.)
Some years ago, I burned myself out on Auster. I read one book,
Moon Palace and then I started reading his work compulsively-- ripping through everything that I could find. It was sort of like eating nothing but peanut butter sandwiches for three months. Very satisfying, but quite difficult to look at the jar after that. And then I left him alone. I ignored newly released books. I wanted nothing more to do with the man.
Then two years ago, someone gave me
The Brooklyn Follies right after it came out. I sighed, but read it. I liked it a lot more than most of the critics and fans. I was back on the slippery slope.
Then this year I picked up and read a
copy of his collected prose. And I was doomed. I've started reading everything that I can get my hands on. And re-reading.
The New York Trilogy was one of the first things that I read by Auster, and one of the most dearly beloved. Rereading
City of Glass was an interesting experience. I wondered whether I would find the same things moving, whether I would still like it as much. I knew that my reading experience would be affected by Auster discussing why he had written the book in his collected prose.
In the end, I found that my own experience of grief/tragedy deepened my connection with Quinn. His need to find threads in the seemingly random is something that I understand better now-- it added some holdfasts to the text that I had lacked before.
It remains a great book.
hy read it if you haven't already? Detectives, writers, identities, loss, intrigue, mistakes, death, sex and consequences. (Putting these things in a line gives the wrong impression, but read it all the same.)
I'm curious whether I'll burn myself out again on Auster a second time.
Any writers who you read in waves? What happened to you when and if you went back a second time?
( more )